![]() When using the vanilla EmacsforOsx binary, a useful site for setting, at least, Emacs server and Emacs client applications is Configuring Emacs on Mac OS X. If you’ve used Emacs before and already have your own Emacs initialization file, then Emacs.app is likely a better choice.Īs compared to Aquamacs, Emacs.app is more traditional in its approach, prefers a single frame, and is more likely to work with existing emacs initialization files. Many find it to be more Mac-like than Emacs.app. If you are a Mac user new to Emacs, many people find Aquamacs to be a good choice. X11 Emacs is the “original” emacs running under X11 (installed by default in recent versions of Mac OS X) As of Emacs 23, Carbon Emacs has been deprecated in favor of Emacs.app. Note that Emacs.app, GNU Emacs/Cocoa, and GNU Emacs/nextstep refer to the same thing.Ĭarbon is the C language API (developed by Apple) that lets applications written under OS 9 (or earlier) run under OS X. Aquamacs and Emacs.app (which was merged into the official Emacs as of Emacs-23) both run under Cocoa. However, there are other Emacs distributions geared towards macOS that include GUI support as well as other features that may make it a more appropriate choice for some, if not most people.Ĭocoa is the Objective-C API (originally developed by NeXT) that is used for native OS X applications (included in Emacs 23.2). On macOS 10.15 Catalina and higher, mg (previously known as microGNUemacs) is still included. Versions of macOS prior to 10.15 Catalina include a copy of GNU Emacs 22 without GUI support compiled in and thus Emacs is automatically available on all but the most recent versions of macOS via the terminal. You can find precompiled versions of emacs and Emacs.app at. “At this point,” he goes on to say, “the credibility of the Mac as a platform for doing enterprise Java development is seriously damaged.The official Emacs fully supports Mac OS X (along with GNU/Linux, Windows, DOS, and then some). The biggest blow will be to Java developers in the enterprise community, “many of whom had been moving to the Mac over recent years because it combined an excellent OS for productivity with the Unix based developer tools they needed to do their jobs.” Sadly at that point they went dead silent on the issue.”įitpatrick says the average Leopard user isn’t likely to be impacted by the omission of 1.6. “Java 6 has been out in general availability for nearly a year at this point, and Apple did tease developers with a Java 6 preview early last year that made it look like they were not going to suffer from there usual abysmal lag time in delivering new versions of Java. So when will Apple users see Java 1.6? Sun “We can’t comment on the timeline because that’s not an operating system that we have a relationship with,” she says.Īpple representatives could not be reached for comment.Īmong the disappointed is Wilhelm Fitzpatrick, enterprise Java developer and consultant, who says he is “frustrated that Apple has decided to make Mac OS X increasingly irrelevant as an enterprise development platform.”įitzpatrick notes that the Java developer community has been itching for the 1.6 upgrade for quite a while. ![]() “The number one things users see by upgrading is that applications run much faster,” says a spokesperson for Sun Microsystems, the creators of Java. That’s not doing much to assuage enterprise users hoping to benefit from increased system performance and developers who were looking forward to additional functionality. The move was likely designed to include backward compatibility among OS X versions and ensure that Java was available on both Intel and PPC-based Macs. Disappointment was nearly instantaneous when it was discovered that Apple had chosen to bundle Java 1.5 with Leopard instead. Java 1.6 is already available for Linux and Windows users, so when a developer preview Java for Mac OS X appeared and, better yet, worked on Leopard, developers were overjoyed. Unfortunately, many users felt that Java 1.5 lacks the juice today’s developers need. By design, Java 6.0 doesn’t easily support Mac OS X Tiger or earlier versions of Apple’s operating systems. There were, however, inherent questions about which version of Java would actually be included. Attendees at Apple’s Worldwide Developers Conference earlier this year were excited by confirmation that Java would be bundled with Leopard.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |